Author Archive
Does anyone have the following virus/COVID-related information? Please share.
A reference or link:
- of having seen or possessing a pure virus’s physical specimen, not an isolate or a picture of a mixture/gunk (commonly referred to as cell culture).
- To an experimental/scientific study showing that the suggested vaccines kill the virus in humans. A physical sample of the dead-virus in the presence of a vaccine or its derivative.
- Showing that face-masks (any type) stop or significantly reduce the virus’s passage (in or out). The study must include a virus sample (not droplets or aerosols only as a virus substitute).
Dear scientists, experts, and authorities, please help. These should be easy questions to answer with all the fundings you have obtained and claims you made. Otherwise, what is the point?
.
.
PS: FYI, the answer is, such links or studies do not exist.
Zoom Meeting with a UK Panel
A couple of days ago, I participated in a Zoom meeting with a UK panel (physicians and others) on the situation (link). The meeting was very long; however, if interested, consider watching at 12:47 and 58:15 (in the latter part, I did not participate as I was not aware that the meeting continued after the disconnect).
It indeed appears that confusion is there, or created, to gain some advantages. Also, it remains questionable practice, at least to me, to treat people, the healthy ones in particular, with a new treatment, which is still in a developmental phase.
As noted here (link), I believe that we may be seriously in a misdiagnosis and mistreatment situation. This situation should not continue.
(Link to the first part of meeting/discussion)
More bad news concerning virus isolation and PCR test
I have been highlighting for some time that the virus (SARS-CoV-2) has never been isolated or positively identified [1,2,3,4]. Therefore, it cannot be claimed that the virus exists, and by extension, the story of the COVID pandemic cannot be considered science-based or factual.
This idea of non-isolation of the virus has been gaining traction. A recent report further emphasized that the SAR-CoV-2 has not been isolated, along with any other viruses in the coronavirus family [5].
The use of the word “isolate,” with the implied meaning or representation of the term isolation of the virus, misled everyone, including physicians, scientists, experts. They assumed that the virus or viruses are real and have been physically isolated.
The article mentioned [5] above also clearly discredit the PCR test’s relevance and usefulness, as I have been saying for quite some time [6,7,8]. A prestigious international expert on the subject, Dr. Stephen Bustin, is quoted, describing both the arbitrariness of criteria for RNA results and choosing the number of cycles leading to anyone testing positive for COVID. The mentioned article [5] discusses the flaws of PCR tests and methodology for its use as a diagnostic tool.
On the other hand, as I have repeatedly described, the PCR test is a chemical test that has never been validated for its intended use. It is a blatant violation of the fundamental principle of science-based chemical/clinical testing. Such a test can never provide relevant and valid results. Surprisingly, such testing is accepted by the regulatory authorities, including the FDA. The test and its associated results should be withdrawn immediately.
In short, claims of isolation of the virus (SARS-CoV-2) and the PCR test are shown to be scientifically invalid and irrelevant.
